5 Responses to “Stanford explores Linked Data”

  1. 1 Marilyn Quinn January 22, 2012 at 6:10 pm

    I thought the report of this workshop was wonderful. I share it with many colleagues who don’t understand linked data and its promises for the library world.


    • 2 Chris Bourg January 23, 2012 at 12:27 pm

      Agreed! The workshop and the report do a great job of pointing us towards an exciting future. Very proud of and impressed by my colleagues who worked on this!


  1. 1 Libraries: We’re actually not all the same | Feral Librarian Trackback on May 30, 2012 at 9:59 am
  2. 2 What could we do in a month? « Feral Librarian Trackback on January 27, 2012 at 10:01 am
  3. 3 Stanford explores Linked Data | Bibliodata | Scoop.it Trackback on November 1, 2011 at 3:40 pm

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow Feral Librarian by email.

Join 13,821 other followers

Follow me on Twitter

  • RT @familyunequal: "by foregoing engagement with the public, scientific institutions forfeit the ability to shape public perceptions...whic… 3 hours ago
  • Yesss! Congratulations all around. twitter.com/farbthink/stat… 3 hours ago
  • RT @WeedenKim: When a woman asks the first question after a seminar, it's less likely that men will ask a disproportionate number of the qu… 3 hours ago
  • RT @rmounce: The ten years reproducibility challenge is an invitation for researchers to try to run the code they’ve created for a scientif… 4 hours ago
  • RT @DrMammon: CUP report that print sales of OA books are only slightly lower than those of traditionally published books, leading @rmounce14 hours ago

%d bloggers like this: