Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship

Scholarly Communications @ Duke recently posted a summary of the Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship.

The Durham Statement calls for law schools to “commit to making the legal scholarship they publish available in stable, open, digital formats in place of print.” In addition, “As a measure of redundancy, we also urge faculty members to reserve their copyrights to ensure that they too can make their own scholarship available in stable, open, digital formats.”

Kevin Smith at Scholarly Communications @ Duke rightly points out that while the usual profit motive is missing from law school publications (since students do all the editorial work), the same reputation and impact motives are at work. Open access law school journals could provide a proof of concept for open access publishing in other areas of scholarship.

Although recent research seems to indicate that the citation boost that accompanies online access is paradoxically larger for fee-based access than open access, I think that trend could change as free open access becomes more common and normative. The Durham Statement seems to be a clear step in the right direction for open access.

I’m happy that my colleague at Stanford’s Crown Law Library, J. Paul Lomio, was one of the signatories; and has already posted it at Legal Research Plus.

0 Responses to “Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow Feral Librarian by email.

Join 9,662 other followers

Follow me on Twitter

  • Anyone have a good source for definition of "knowledge object" or a better term? 47 minutes ago
  • @PrangeMartin Oh trust me, the crush was quite relevant and I'm totally comfortable with that 2 hours ago
  • with the benefit of maturity and hindsight, i realize i was wrong . . . i didn't do it out of moral outrage. I had a crush on her. 4 hours ago
  • to my young activist mind, that meant she should not be compelled to stand and pledge allegiance to the US flag. So, I sat in protest + 4 hours ago
  • true story - in 4th grade, we had a classmate whose dad was a british ambassador or some such. anyway - she wasn't… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 4 hours ago

%d bloggers like this: