Google Books more open than Open Content Alliance?

In Mass book digitization: The deeper story of Google Books and the Open Content Alliance, Kalev Leetaru takes a comparative look at the Google Books Search project and the Open Content Alliance:

Upon delving deeper into the underpinnings of both projects, we find Google achieves greater transparency in many regards, while OCA’s operational reality is more proprietary than often thought. Further, significant concerns are raised about the long–term sustainability of the OCA rights model, its metadata management, and its transparency that must be addressed as OCA moves forward.

From the article, similarities between Google Books and OCA are:

  • Both operate as a black box outsourcing agent.
  • Neither publishes official technical reports.
  • Both digitize in–copyright works.
  • Both use manual page turning and digital camera capture.
  • Both permit libraries to redistribute materials digitized from their collections.
  • Both permit unlimited personal use of out–of–copyright works.
  • Both enforce some restrictions on redistribution or commercial use.

Read the full article in First Monday.

0 Responses to “Google Books more open than Open Content Alliance?”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow Feral Librarian by email.

Join 8,072 other followers

Follow me on Twitter

  • @jvinopal @olinj started reading this in the middle and was hoping for some metaphor about fighting nazis via immunization/punching 1 hour ago
  • with @librarycourtney at the helm and folks like @kgs on the team, I have confidence the ALA ED search committee will do us proud. 1 hour ago
  • @wrk2lib my perspective is limited, but that's not the case in research libraries and some suggest trend is in direction of "or equivalent" 1 hour ago
  • @wrk2lib I appreciate your take and agree on your alt option. My only quibble is the assertion that MLS is currently req's for all prof jobs 1 hour ago
  • @joanpdx you just made my day!! 1 hour ago

%d bloggers like this: